TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tJtGV-0000HsC; Sun, 26 Nov 95 20:25 CST
Old-Return-Path:
<miso!aol.com!CLGUno>
Date:
Sat, 25 Nov 1995 15:46:02 -0500
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Message-ID:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/252
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15:
21:05 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"Z4FEC3.0.IKF.n6Ikm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Resent-Sender:
Resent-From:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Does anybody have a definitive Cause and Corrective Action for a problem that
seems to occue infrequently with oxiding?  

Specifically a detail with a power or ground plane and a signal layer
opposite will oxide fine on the power/ground side, but will occasionally
oxide incompletely on the other side.

I've always thought it was basically a cleaning problem, and I know it has
occurred on a variety of coppers and substrates.  But on occasion it has been
very persistent, unable to be improved by strip and re-oxide for example.

Very frustrating to the PWB producer and both the laminator and the chemical
supplier get accused of having something wrong with their products.

Any ideas?



ATOM RSS1 RSS2