TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
X400-Content-Type:
P2-1988 (22)
Old-Return-Path:
<miso!mmm.com!gjwiltscheck>
Date:
Tue, 21 Nov 1995 12:53:36 -0600
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/224
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15:
19:44 1996
TO:
"TECHNET(a)IPCHQ.COM" <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
X400-Recipients:
X-Loop:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"gkLCD2.0.2lE.Xjsim"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tIJsa-0000H1C; Wed, 22 Nov 95 12:26 CST
X400-Originator:
Message-Id:
<0015100001646989000004*@MHS>
X400-Mts-Identifier:
[/PRMD=MMM/ADMD=IBMMAIL/C=US/;0015100001646989000004]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
 
 
----- Item 1 -----
 
To : Gary WILTSCHECK (HPDESK.US226783) / SSW,
     Technet IPCHQ (INTERNET.TECHNET) / SSW
 
 
 
 
----- Item 2 -----
 
To : Gary WILTSCHECK (HPDESK.US226783) / SSW,
     Technet IPCHQ (INTERNET.MAIL) / SSW,
     Technet IPCHQ (INTERNET.TECHNET) / SSW
 
 
 
 
----- Item 3 -----
 
 
Hi, I need help interpreting an IPC 610 specification!
This is my first attempt at using the internet, so I'm anxious to see any
response.
 
In IPC-A-610 rev B, section 9.1.9, page 95, under the section entitled
"Solderless Wrap-Damaged Insulation & Termianls":
 
For FIG 9-20, I feel there's a conflict between what's acceptable and what's a
defect.  It says its a defect for Class 3 if the "base metal is exposed".
However, just above that statement, listed Under Acceptable-Class 1,2,3 Item
B, nicks, scrapes gouges, etc. are okay "not exceeding 25% of wire diameter".
 
I interpret this to mean the accept condition allows up to 25%, while the
defect condition doesn't allow anything.  Am I missing something?
 
I would appreciate any advice, by sending to me(Gary Wiltscheck at 3M, New Ulm,
Minnesota) at:
 
[log in to unmask]
 
Thanks in advance!
 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2