 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tAJ1o-0000KxC; Tue, 31 Oct 95 09:55 CST |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!foxboro.com!rsmith> |
| Date: |
Tue, 31 Oct 95 10:41:44 est |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15: |
16:53 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"oZTfi.0.rXC.SRabm"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
SelectMAIL 1.2 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree with Al that the requirement for crop marks is mostly past us.
I disagree that moires are in the same category. There are many cases
where designs do not contain a consistent feature on all layers. Without
this feature there is no certain way to assure alignment prior to fab.
BOB SMITH
|
|
|
