TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0t8FpM-0000M8C; Wed, 25 Oct 95 19:05 CDT
Encoding:
800 Text
Old-Return-Path:
<miso!hadco.com!dhoover>
Date:
Wed, 25 Oct 95 13:05:11 EST
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/90
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15:
13:01 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"UOn05.0.aaC.P3jZm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Resent-From:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
     
     I have a customer who is testing between two surface conductors
     at 3000 volts. The spacing is at .126". I believe this criteria
     comes from a Bellcore spec. (??? Not sure) When we look up data
     for design in MIL-STD-275 (I believe now it's IPC-D-275) we see 
     that at 3000 volts we should have spacing ~ at .360". 
     (.00012"/volt)(3000 volts)=.36" . (Thanks Steve)
     
     For those of you who are familiar with Bellcore or similar types
     of testing, is this a common test?
     
     Does that spacing appear to be such to open the possibility of
     failure or breakdown?
     
     
     (Being a fabricator, I'm not real versed with tests such as this.)
     
     
     Thanks in advance for any and all responses.
     
     Groovy 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2