 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0t8FpM-0000M8C; Wed, 25 Oct 95 19:05 CDT |
| Encoding: |
800 Text |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!hadco.com!dhoover> |
| Date: |
Wed, 25 Oct 95 13:05:11 EST |
| Precedence: |
list |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15: |
13:01 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"UOn05.0.aaC.P3jZm"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I have a customer who is testing between two surface conductors
at 3000 volts. The spacing is at .126". I believe this criteria
comes from a Bellcore spec. (??? Not sure) When we look up data
for design in MIL-STD-275 (I believe now it's IPC-D-275) we see
that at 3000 volts we should have spacing ~ at .360".
(.00012"/volt)(3000 volts)=.36" . (Thanks Steve)
For those of you who are familiar with Bellcore or similar types
of testing, is this a common test?
Does that spacing appear to be such to open the possibility of
failure or breakdown?
(Being a fabricator, I'm not real versed with tests such as this.)
Thanks in advance for any and all responses.
Groovy
|
|
|
