TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0t5Dny-0000H0C; Tue, 17 Oct 95 10:19 CDT
Encoding:
10 TEXT
Old-Return-Path:
<[log in to unmask]> <miso!eag.unisysgsg.com!KTHORSON>
Date:
Tue, 17 Oct 95 10:01:00 CST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1384
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15:
05:25 1996
TO:
'IPC Technical Forum' <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"k-ryW2.0.jt2.LbyWm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Thorson, Kevin J @EAG" <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
X-Mailer:
Microsoft Mail V3.0
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)

The design guides for MIL-STD-275 and IPC-D-275 require non-functional pads 
on all layers of a multilayer PWB.  Can manufacturers remove them an their 
judgment?

If anyone knows the verse and script, that would be great.

Thank you in advance,
Kevin Thorson
Loral Defense Systems - Eagan



ATOM RSS1 RSS2