 
| Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0t38E2-0000HAC; Wed, 11 Oct 95 15:58 CDT |
| Encoding: |
19 TEXT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 11 Oct 95 15:54:00 EST |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
<307BE89F@MSMAIL-GTWY> |
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15: |
03:38 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"UQYN22.0.pvC.2_2Vm"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
Microsoft Mail V3.0 |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I am looking for justification information with respect to Accelerated
Reliability Testing of Surface Mount Devices (BGAs in particular)
Anyone w/ experience w.r.t. accel life testing as defined in IPC-SM-785
(Nov 92)
design of test vehicle
structure of tests
What about sample conditioning? Is it necessary? Do people do this?
(ref IPC-SM-785 7.9.5 - Sample Conditioning)
What about cycling ramp rates and how are they significant?
Please contact Bill Goers at [log in to unmask] or (317)
226-5627 if you have any background information about Accelereated
Reliability Testing.
Thank you
|
|
|
