TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0t2fjB-0000IsC; Tue, 10 Oct 95 09:32 CDT
Encoding:
8 TEXT
Old-Return-Path:
<[log in to unmask]> <miso!empf.nawc-ad-indy.navy.mil!crawfoj>
Date:
Tue, 10 Oct 95 08:53:00 EST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Message-ID:
<307A3739@MSMAIL-GTWY>
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1335
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15:
02:50 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"urDsD1.0.TOG.RFeUm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Crawford, John A." <[log in to unmask]>
Resent-Sender:
X-Mailer:
Microsoft Mail V3.0
X-Loop:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)

>From the EMPF HelpLine:  Discussion with our several process and 
solderability experts leads to the conclusion that your question can best be 
answered only by your component supplier(s). It would be possible to test 
and determine the characteristics associated with a single component batch 
from a given vendor, but overall, there are too many variations in 
material/mfg processes to categorize "plastic" component bodies with a 
"typical" range as you requested.



ATOM RSS1 RSS2