 
| Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0syfxp-0000H7C; Fri, 29 Sep 95 08:58 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 29 Sep 1995 08:58:38 -0500 (CDT) |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
<Pine.3.89.9509290838.C58121-0100000@ipc> |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"tWFCd.0.1GA.Jk_Qm"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14: |
54:39 1996 |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
IPC-6011 and IPC-6012, which replace IPC-RB-276, are currently drafts.
Publication is tentatively next June at the earliest.
Mike Buetow
IPC Technical Staff
2215 Sanders Road
Northbrook, IL 60062-6135
T: 708-509-9700
F: 708-509-9798
[log in to unmask]
On Thu, 28 Sep 1995 [log in to unmask] wrote:
> To Whom;
>
> The IPC-RB-276 has been recently revised to include additional gold and
> nickel thicknesses for various applications. I'm unsure whether the new
> printed version is currently shipping, but a call to the IPC office will give
> you the answer.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gary Ferrari
> Tech Circuits, Inc
>
>
|
|
|
