TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0sxdnK-0000HYC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 12:27 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
<[log in to unmask]> <miso!ATK.COM!Mary_Davis>
Date:
26 Sep 1995 12:30:34 -0600
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1230
TO:
"TechNet IPC headquarters" <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"dN683.0.ZKC.mV3Qm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Mary Davis" <[log in to unmask]>
Resent-From:
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14:
53:33 1996
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
                       Subject:                               Time:10:23 AM
  OFFICE MEMO          RE" Cleanliness Correlation            Date:9/26/95
Jim Marsico asked:
Can anyone tell me the correlation between micrograms/square centimeter and 
resistivity for PWB cleanliness?

Look in IPC-TM-650, 2.3.26.1, Ionizable Detection of Surface Contamination
(Static Method).  This test method shows the formula for the relationship
between solution resistivity (starting and ending) and micrograms/sq. in. 
The formula is also in our Omegameter 600SMD owners manual.

Mary Davis
[log in to unmask]





ATOM RSS1 RSS2