 
| Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0swzVn-0000H8C; Sun, 24 Sep 95 17:27 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Sun, 24 Sep 1995 13:52:45 EDT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"YoLpr2.0.Vo6.fiTPm"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14: |
52:58 1996 |
| X-Mailer: |
PRODIGY Services Company Internet mailer [PIM 3.2-342.56] |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Steve
The price of (4) layer boards has changed very little in the last 5
years. As off-shore vendors got into the (4) layer market, the
pricing became very competitive. Your greatest advantage today,
relative to pricing, is how bad does the vendor need the work? This
has the greatest effect on the pricing. Be aware, the industry is
beginning to get very busy. This will effect the future pricing of
any layer count in the future. Sorry, can't offer anything further
on this subject at this time.
Norm Einarson
<[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
