TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0stKVq-0000GxC; Thu, 14 Sep 95 15:03 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
<[log in to unmask]> <miso!aol.com!BennyHonna>
Date:
Thu, 14 Sep 1995 15:43:51 -0400
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Message-ID:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1138
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"S7abo3.0.WD4.Fg8Mm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14:
48:46 1996
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
HELP! HELP! I am looking for information, i.e. articles, publications of any
kind and/or
general feed back regarding bare board repair/re-working trends and overall
attitudes.

I am not looking for specific technical information regarding re-work, rather
what is going on in the industry.  I specifically am interested in finding
out if the industry (over the past 5 years or so) is doing more or less of
the following: 

A.  Fixing surface shorts.
B.  Welding surface opens
C.  Drillingl internal shorts

Also feed back on:

A.  Type of equipment most preferred
B.  Is re-work being sent out or done in house more often (or not done at
all)

Additionally, I would be interested in any personal experiences regarding
this field.

Thank you very much for your help.

Sincerely,


Mark Dragan
HV Test, Inc.






ATOM RSS1 RSS2