Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0sr4zG-0000GmC; Fri, 8 Sep 95 10:05 CDT |
Encoding: |
1592 Text |
Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!pragma.pragma.com!ebernal> |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Sep 95 07:47:56 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"TcNgc1.0.gf6.Ok5Km"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14: |
44:34 1996 |
X-Loop: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We have always used this formula.
No more than a 4" stack of boards
150 F for 4 hrs.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: PCB Pre Bake
Author: [log in to unmask] at ~INTERNET
Date: 9/7/95 6:33 PM
Received: by ccmail
Received: from netcomsv by pragma.com (UUPC/extended 1.11) with UUCP;
Thu, 07 Sep 1995 18:32:48 PDT
Received: from miso.wwa.com by netcomsv.netcom.com with SMTP (8.6.12/SMI-4.1)
id SAA27804; Thu, 7 Sep 1995 18:03:13 -0700
Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Sep 1995 18:03:13 -0700
Received: from ipc by miso.wwa.com with uucp
(Smail3.1.28.1 #8) id m0sqrtQ-000FglC; Thu, 7 Sep 95 20:06 CDT
Received: by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0sqrH4-0000GeC; Thu, 7 Sep 95 19:26 CDT
Old-Return-Path: <miso!adam.com.au!igraham>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 1995 09:49:58 +0930 (CST)
From: ian graham <[log in to unmask]>
X-ccAdmin: postmaster@netcomsv
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: PCB Pre Bake
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"TiTHR.0.44A.rsuJm"@ipc>
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
X-ccAdmin: postmaster@netcomsv
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1048
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
What time/temperature profile is suitable for FR4 and FR5 prebaking prior
to assembly?
Process is print, place and reflow.
--------
Ian Graham [log in to unmask]
|
|
|