TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0soBIi-0000GeC; Thu, 31 Aug 95 10:13 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
<miso!norden.com!vanech>
Date:
Thu, 31 Aug 95 10:48:32 EDT
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Cc:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1004
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"PvYCE1.0.nM7.36THm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Scicards(R) user id)
Resent-Sender:
X-Loop:
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14:
41:22 1996
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
>From [log in to unmask] Thu Aug 31 10:16:30 1995
Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from caesv1.norden.com ([155.104.1.11]) by clam.norden.com.norden.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA03993; Thu, 31 Aug 95 10:16:29 EDT
Received: from norden.com ([155.104.1.200]) by caesv1.norden.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA20280; Thu, 31 Aug 95 10:17:26 EDT
Received: by norden.com (8.6.9/NORDEN_MAIL_V8)
	id KAA21131; Thu, 31 Aug 1995 10:25:35 -0400
Received: from unknown(155.104.1.252) by nsinfw via smap (V1.3mjr)
	id sma021129; Thu Aug 31 10:25:33 1995
Received: by clam.norden.com.norden.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA03990; Thu, 31 Aug 95 10:16:24 EDT
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 95 10:16:24 EDT

To whom ---
           Could someone please explain, in laymen's terms, the differences
           among Windows 3.1, Windows NT and Windows 95. I asked this question 
           last week and received no response. Either no one knew, or more
           likely the case, I screwed up--operator error. I'll try again.
           Thanks in advance.             

                                             Bob Vanech
                                             E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
                                             Phone:  203 852 4810  



ATOM RSS1 RSS2