 
| Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0so0UV-0000IiC; Wed, 30 Aug 95 22:40 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!aol.com!LouisHart> |
| Date: |
Tue, 29 Aug 1995 22:35:12 -0400 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"09o4t.0.uH7.myIHm"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14: |
41:01 1996 |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks for your comments, Jamie. I will talk with our engineer about them.
He is a young fellow who is very conscientious, but limited in experience.
I have been a QA manager in the PC business for barely 1.5 years. Since my
first note, I have learned that we are having problems with dry film
adhesion, it is stripped off and reapplied if anything goes wrong, so
problems are hidden, to some extent. I have noticed that IPC-SM-839 has some
discussion of adhesion promoters, along with cleaning of boards before mask
application. Lou Hart, Compunetics, Monroeville, PA
|
|
|
