Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0sdQrh-0000GlC; Tue, 1 Aug 95 18:36 CDT |
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Old-Return-Path: |
<bergda> |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Aug 1995 18:36:45 -0500 (CDT) |
Precedence: |
list |
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14: |
27:47 1996 |
cc: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"CxNQC3.0.bK6.Ggh7m"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Resent-From: |
|
Message-ID: |
<Pine.3.89.9508011805.C64975-0100000@ipc> |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
IPC is not actively planning anything to replace these documents. IPC
has had replacement documents available for over 10 years. These
documents are IPC-D-275 which has already replaced MIL-STD-275, and
IPC-RB-276 which is a perfectly adequate replacement for MIL-P-55110.
What is being considered right now is whether anything necessary to
replace the associated QPL for 55110.
Regards
***************************************************
David W. Bergman, Technical Director
IPC
7380 N. Lincoln Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL 60646
708-677-2850 x340 Phone
708-677-9570 Fax
email [log in to unmask]
***************************************************
On Tue, 1 Aug 1995 [log in to unmask] wrote:
> Could someone from IPC respond to what is planned for the future regarding
> migrating from military specs to IPC specs for rigid pwb's?
>
> For example Mil-P-55110 and D-275
>
> --------------------------------------
> Larry L. Pucket
> Sandia National Labs.
> Dept. 2784 MS/0628
> P.O. Box 5800
> Albuquerque, NM 87185-0628
>
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> Phone: (505) 844-1711
> Fax: (505) 844-7428
>
>
|
|
|