TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0sdQrh-0000GlC; Tue, 1 Aug 95 18:36 CDT
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Old-Return-Path:
<bergda>
Date:
Tue, 1 Aug 1995 18:36:45 -0500 (CDT)
Precedence:
list
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14:
27:47 1996
cc:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/773
TO:
Return-Path:
X-Status:
Resent-Sender:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"CxNQC3.0.bK6.Ggh7m"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
David Bergman <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
In-Reply-To:
Resent-From:
Message-ID:
<Pine.3.89.9508011805.C64975-0100000@ipc>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (43 lines)
IPC is not actively planning anything to replace these documents.  IPC 
has had replacement documents available for over 10 years.  These 
documents are IPC-D-275 which has already replaced MIL-STD-275, and 
IPC-RB-276 which is a perfectly adequate replacement for MIL-P-55110.

What is being considered right now is whether anything necessary to 
replace the associated QPL for 55110.

Regards

***************************************************
David W. Bergman, Technical Director
IPC
7380 N. Lincoln Avenue
Lincolnwood, IL  60646
708-677-2850 x340 Phone
708-677-9570 Fax
email  [log in to unmask]
***************************************************


On Tue, 1 Aug 1995 [log in to unmask] wrote:

> Could someone from IPC respond to what is planned for the future regarding
> migrating from military specs to IPC specs for rigid pwb's?
> 
> For example Mil-P-55110 and D-275
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Larry L. Pucket
> Sandia National Labs.
> Dept. 2784  MS/0628
> P.O. Box 5800
> Albuquerque, NM 87185-0628
> 
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> Phone: (505) 844-1711
> Fax:   (505) 844-7428
> 
> 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2