TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Old-Return-Path:
<miso!telecomm.tadiran.co.il!mickey>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jul 1995 08:30:53 +0300 (IDT)
Precedence:
list
Reply-To:
"Mickey Weiner (2937)" <[log in to unmask]>
Cc:
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/732
TO:
Tom Tindale <[log in to unmask]>
Resent-Sender:
X-Loop:
Received:
from gagme.wwa.com by vnet.IBM.COM (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with TCP; Wed, 26 Jul 95 10:46:27 EDT from ipc by gagme.wwa.com with uucp (Smail3.1.28.1 #8) id m0sb7iT-000FFVC; Wed, 26 Jul 95 09:45 CDT by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0sb6zP-0000GsC; Wed, 26 Jul 95 08:59 CDT
Resent-Message-ID:
<"SMSjT1.0.0k6.gea5m"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Mickey Weiner (2937)" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:
"Mickey Weiner (2937)" <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Resent-From:
Message-Id:
<Pine.3.05.9507260832.A4155-b100000@neptune>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (40 lines)
                                                                               
 hi tom,                                                                       
                                                                               
 A reference which we keep using as a guide is found in mil-f-14072b,          
 para. 3.13 and the table of "compatible couples".                             
 There are also solderability issues associated with gold plated lugs.         
                                                                               
 regards,                                                                      
 mickey                                                                        
                                                                               
On Thu, 20 Jul 1995, Tom Tindale wrote:                                        
                                                                               
> We have a customer who requires tin/tin type sockets as opposed to tin/gold  
> for all their socketed components. Their reasoning is based on the corrosion 
> potential from the dissimilar metals. Our problem is that tin/tin sockets    
> are becoming increasingly more difficult to obtain, and in some cases more   
> expensive than their gold plated counterparts. My question is: Has anyone    
> have any information  or done any testing on this subject. We would like to  
> change their thinking if possible. Any information would be appreciated.     
>                                                                              
> Thanks,                                                                      
>                                                                              
> Thomas Tindale                                                               
> Lead Manufacturing Engineer                                                  
> Performance Computer                                                         
> 315 Science Parkway                                                          
> Rochester, New York 14620                                                    
> 716.256.0200 Phone                                                           
> 716.256.0791 Fax                                                             
> e-mail [log in to unmask]                                                            
>                                                                              
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               




ATOM RSS1 RSS2