TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0sbUte-0000GZC; Thu, 27 Jul 95 10:30 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
<miso!knox.pcec.philips.com!vaillant>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jul 95 11:03:27 EDT
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/745
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"Q6FGP1.0.9a7.X4x5m"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Tom Vaillancourt 3482 )
Resent-From:
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14:
26:24 1996
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)


	I am looking for any information concerning the minimum distance between
	a via to smt land (1206, 0805, and 0603). Currently we are using a 
        .015 hole / .030 pad non-tented via. Is anyone out there burying the
	via in the center of the land? The wave side is not as much of a concern
        as the reflow side. We are planning to run some test boards with several
	configurations. I would appreciate any feed back.


	Tom Vaillancourt
	Philips Consumer Electronics Co.
	615-521-3482
	Internet: [log in to unmask]





ATOM RSS1 RSS2