DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

1995

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tJoEy-0000QlC; Sun, 26 Nov 95 15:04 CST
Old-Return-Path:
<miso!arcserv.dasd.honeywell.com!aslagle>
Date:
Wed, 22 Nov 95 14:18:27 MST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Cc:
From [log in to unmask] Sun Nov 26 15:
13:14 1995
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/274
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"LW9mv3.0.4-5.xODkm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Al Slagle)
X-Status:
Resent-Sender:
X-Loop:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)


Hello Frank,

It's good to hear from someone like yourself. It is also quite evident that you
represent your chapter very well.

I've learned more from your one letter than from 3 months of reading IPC's
designer council letters.

I thing the industry would be much better represented if you worked for IPC
and took charge of the whole process.

As the weeks pass it's apparent IPC does not have a clue as to what they are
doing or trying to force others to accomplish.

I hope you and other chapter leaders will share your groups conclusions with
the rest of us.

Thanks
Al Slagle
[log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2