TECHNET Archives

March 2021

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jodi Sanchez <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Jodi Sanchez <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 1 Mar 2021 12:46:03 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (127 lines)
Can you please tell me which clause

On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 12:35 PM [log in to unmask] <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Criteria for terminal blocks is in IPC 620.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Gumpert, Ben
> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 8:59 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] EXTERNAL: [TN] TERMINAL BLOCK REQUIREMENTS
>
> ----
> External E-mail --- CAUTION: This email originated from outside GDMS. Do
> not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
> know the content is safe.
>
> Jodi,
>
> The image gets stripped, so for everyone else, here's something similar to
> what Jodi is asking about:
> 1-284506-0 : Buchanan PCB Terminal Blocks | TE Connectivity<
> https://www.te.com/usa-en/product-1-284506-0.html>
>
> No, I don't think that type of termination is specifically covered.
>
> There are very few instances that I can think of where IPC standards
> dictate what type of hardware or configurations are or are not allowed for
> certain Classes. For the most part, the standards provide the
> assembly/acceptance requirements and it is up to the engineering documents
> to dictate the hardware used. So if your documents don't call for any kind
> of contact or termination to be applied to the end of the wire then you
> can't add one, and the wire itself would be terminated in this block.
>
> Ben Gumpert
>
> From: Jodi Sanchez <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 5:12 PM
> To: Gumpert, Ben (US) <[log in to unmask]>
> Cc: TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: [TN] TERMINAL BLOCK REQUIREMENTS
>
> Hi Ben
>  I did see that but that doesn't apply to this . These are terminal blocks
> from Phoenix . I just could find this in the IPC book . I could only find
> that in Europe they are required but nothing about the US
>
>
> [cid:[log in to unmask]]
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 4:48 PM Gumpert, Ben <[log in to unmask]<mailto:
> [log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> Jodi,
>
> What document are you looking at or working to?
> IPC-A-610 4.1.5.3 has some criteria specific to stranded wires under the
> head of a threaded fastener, which may apply to your hardware.
>
> Ben Gumpert
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> On Behalf Of Jodi
> Sanchez
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 10:20 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: EXTERNAL: [TN] TERMINAL BLOCK REQUIREMENTS
>
> Good Morning,
> I am looking for the requirement per IPC for stranded wire terminated into
> terminal Blocks.  5.4 says termination ferrules are typically used to
> terminate stranded wires into terminal blocks. I do not see if they are
> required per IPC or not .This is a Class 3 product . Thank you for your
> help in advance
>
> --
>
> Jodi Sanchez
>
>
> *Engineering Technician*
>
> *Cable Manufacturing *
>
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
> 860 779.4339
>
> Dayville CT USA
>
>
> --
>
> Jodi Sanchez
>
> Engineering Technician
>
> Cable Manufacturing
>
>
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
> 860 779.4339
>
> Dayville CT USA
>
>
>
> [Image removed by sender.]
>


-- 

Jodi Sanchez


*Engineering Technician*

*Cable Manufacturing *

[log in to unmask]

860 779.4339

Dayville CT USA

ATOM RSS1 RSS2