TECHNET Archives

February 2021

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Sun, 28 Feb 2021 17:34:42 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (86 lines)
Criteria for terminal blocks is in IPC 620.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Gumpert, Ben
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 8:59 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] EXTERNAL: [TN] TERMINAL BLOCK REQUIREMENTS

----
External E-mail --- CAUTION: This email originated from outside GDMS. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Jodi,

The image gets stripped, so for everyone else, here's something similar to what Jodi is asking about:
1-284506-0 : Buchanan PCB Terminal Blocks | TE Connectivity<https://www.te.com/usa-en/product-1-284506-0.html>

No, I don't think that type of termination is specifically covered.

There are very few instances that I can think of where IPC standards dictate what type of hardware or configurations are or are not allowed for certain Classes. For the most part, the standards provide the assembly/acceptance requirements and it is up to the engineering documents to dictate the hardware used. So if your documents don't call for any kind of contact or termination to be applied to the end of the wire then you can't add one, and the wire itself would be terminated in this block.

Ben Gumpert

From: Jodi Sanchez <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 5:12 PM
To: Gumpert, Ben (US) <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: [TN] TERMINAL BLOCK REQUIREMENTS

Hi Ben
 I did see that but that doesn't apply to this . These are terminal blocks from Phoenix . I just could find this in the IPC book . I could only find that in Europe they are required but nothing about the US


[cid:[log in to unmask]]

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 4:48 PM Gumpert, Ben <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
Jodi,

What document are you looking at or working to?
IPC-A-610 4.1.5.3 has some criteria specific to stranded wires under the head of a threaded fastener, which may apply to your hardware.

Ben Gumpert

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> On Behalf Of Jodi Sanchez
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 10:20 AM
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: EXTERNAL: [TN] TERMINAL BLOCK REQUIREMENTS

Good Morning,
I am looking for the requirement per IPC for stranded wire terminated into terminal Blocks.  5.4 says termination ferrules are typically used to terminate stranded wires into terminal blocks. I do not see if they are required per IPC or not .This is a Class 3 product . Thank you for your help in advance

--

Jodi Sanchez


*Engineering Technician*

*Cable Manufacturing *

[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

860 779.4339

Dayville CT USA


--

Jodi Sanchez

Engineering Technician

Cable Manufacturing


[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

860 779.4339

Dayville CT USA



[Image removed by sender.]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2