Hi All,
Joyce Koo tried to post this reply, but is kicked off the list for some
reason and asked me to post this for her:
<[log in to unmask]>: host d96695a.ess.barracudanetworks.com[209.222.82.253]
said:
550 permanent failure for one or more recipients ([log in to unmask]
:blocked)
(in reply to end of DATA command)
Reporting-MTA: dns; mx4.look.ca
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 9F0955398E5
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; [log in to unmask]
Arrival-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:27:21 -0500 (EST)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; [log in to unmask]
Original-Recipient: rfc822;[log in to unmask]
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; d96695a.ess.barracudanetworks.com
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 permanent failure for one or more recipients
([log in to unmask]:blocked)
*From: *Yuan-chia Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
*Date: *February 11, 2021 8:31:23 AM EST (CA)
*To: *TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Richard Kraszewski <
[log in to unmask]>
*Subject: **Re: [TN] Most UV Resistant (conformal) coating?*
without knowing what is your application for UV intensity, as doug said,
hard to select. If just the UV you are worry about, you can use $$ - PTFE
might be your best bet if money is not issue...
https://www.thorlabs.com/newgrouppage9.cfm?objectgroup_id=13871
Application is key: to prevent IC - a bit thicker molding compound would
work (UV erasable type), even just a good piece of tape. it either
protected by UV blocking (molding compound) or UV reflecting (mirror like
coating). Exposure time, intensity also matters as well as type of UV - A,
B, or C. with presence of other lights. IMHO.
Good luck.
jk
On Feb 10, 2021, at 11:09 AM, Richard Kraszewski wrote:
Anyone have a clue as to what type of coating that would be?
Rich Kraszewski
Plexus Senior Staff Process Engineer
* * * * * * * * CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE * * * * * * * *
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential from Plexus Corp. and may
contain information which is privileged, confidential, and/or protected by
non-disclosure agreements. They are intended solely for the use of the
named addressee(s). . Any unauthorized use or disclosure may be
unlawful. If you are not a named addressee, you must not use, disclose,
retain or reproduce all or any part of the information contained in this
e-mail or any attachments If you have received this transmission in error,
please destroy it and notify us immediately by return e-mail or by calling
+ 1 888 208 9005.
--
Steve Gregory
Kimco Design and Manufacturing
Process Engineer
(208) 322-0500 Ext. -3133
Cell Phone: (918) 706-2779
--
This email and any attachments are only
for use by the intended
recipient(s) and may contain legally privileged,
confidential, proprietary
or otherwise private information. Any
unauthorized use, reproduction,
dissemination, distribution or other
disclosure of the contents of this
e-mail or its attachments is strictly
prohibited. If you have received
this email in error, please notify the
sender immediately and delete the
original.
|
