TECHNET Archives

February 2020

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D
Date:
Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:56:03 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Some more:

How a typical DI tank farm or system works, maintenance of the DI tanks, chemical treatment for microbial or bacterial issues with the municipal water supply. (Ain’t I a fun gi?, LOL)

Considerations for water use, and the monitoring thereof.

Local environmental laws, regulations, and ordinances related to release of wash water into municipal waste treatment systems, permits required, COD testing or other waste testing that may be required, why it is a good idea to establish a personal relationship with the local environmental waste office and how they are a valuable resource in how to deal with spent de-scaling compounds, etc.

How to safely dispose of salamander eggs, tadpoles, minnows, water spiders, LSD, and prohibited weeds from the local water supply.



Which brings me to Maintenance:



Review of the cleaner’s maintenance program, is it up-to-date and is it sufficient? Do the PM intervals make sense for daily, monthly, yearly or semi-yearly procedures? Is it being performed as defined? Does the machine require de-scaling periodically? Are safety procedures in place that are applicable to Maintenance (tag-out, power-down, personal protective equipment when working around chemical de-scaling compounds and other chemicals, etc).

Proper documentation of daily mix verification or verification of water pressure, water temperature, rinse temperature, belt speed, etc.



I’ll keep thinking, I am sure there is more.



Odin





From: Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 10:30 AM

To: TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Stadem, Richard D <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: [External] Re: [TN] Cleaning Course of Study



An excellent set of points.  Thank you Odin.  I especially like #5.  A corollary would be not to use the reflow oven as a pizza oven.



Douglas Pauls | Principal Materials and Process Engr | Advanced Operations Engineering

COLLINS AEROSPACE

400 Collins Road NE, MS 108-101, Cedar Rapids, IA  52498  USA

Tel: +1 319 295 2109 | Mobile: +1 319 431 3773

[log in to unmask]<http://collins.com>

[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> for all Export Compliant Items





On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 10:27 AM Stadem, Richard D <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

I think it is critical to train in the basic fundamentals, as applicable. Handling after the wash is critical;



1. Ensure a good blow-off of any remaining water is performed, and explain that even after a good wash and rinse, CCAs should never be allowed to sit with standing water that can evaporate, leaving behind white residue in the form of suspended flux particles, minerals, etc. This is applicable to most in-line cleaners, perhaps not for many batch (non-conveyor) cleaners which typically perform a drying function within the chamber at the end of the final rinse. A good blow-off or drying cycle takes any remaining contamination off of most of the CCA with the leftover water.

2. Never package wet CCAs directly into closed ESD boxes, bags, or other packaging. This ensures creep corrosion, etc., etc,.

3. A section on saponifier mix verification, typically done with in-situ process analyzers, or whatever method the saponifier manufacturer recommends. Information on how the ventilation of the cleaner can cause changing mix ratio levels, etc

4. Matching of the cleaning process for the flux(s) used. Considerations to be given to using batch cleaning with an appropriate saponifier or solvent for non-water soluble fluxes, and perhaps an in-line conveyorized machine for soluble. Or vice-versa, dependent on the typical product mix.

5. Why the cleaning process should ONLY be used for cleaning fluxes and "normal" soils, and not for cleaning carburetors, smocks, removing of the wrong adhesive (uncured), cleaning of newly-machined shop fixtures/tools covered with silicone-bearing cutting grease or oils.

6. Prevention of silicone contamination in general. Nothing like an operator cleaning heatsink grease as part of a rework procedure to screw up your wash process permanently. Just try coating boards after they have been washed in a silicone-contaminated cleaner. Such fun!



I will think of more, whether you like it or not, LOL!



dean





-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> On Behalf Of Douglas Pauls

Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 6:43 AM

To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

Subject: [TN] Cleaning Course of Study



Good morning Technetians



OK, so I have been thinking (and we know how dangerous that is) about developing a course of study for someone to become a "cleaning expert".

Something along the lines of starting with a new hire and educating the new hires up to my level. Courses would include things like flux chemistry, cleaning processes and chemistry, cleanliness measurement methods, SIR methods, etc.  What items would you suggest be added to the course of study?



*Douglas Pauls *| Principal Materials and Process Engr | Advanced Operations Engineering



*COLLINS AEROSPACE*



400 Collins Road NE, MS 108-101, Cedar Rapids, IA  52498  USA



*Tel:* +1 319 295 2109 | *Mobile: *+1 319 431 3773



[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>



[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> for all Export Compliant Items


ATOM RSS1 RSS2