TECHNET Archives

February 2020

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D
Date:
Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:33:03 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
I have never heard of a design guideline in the ratio of unused balls to circuit-connected balls. Not sure why there should be a ratio from an electrical performance standpoint?

Solder balls that are not connected to the BGA circuity are used to balance out the package wetting forces during reflow, as well as to distribute CTE forces between the PWB and the BGA package. This is a BGA design characteristic, most likely any ratio would be in the component design guidelines in JEP95 or more specifically JEDEC Standard DR-4.14J.01. It may also be in some ANSI or other standard. Here is a link      https://www.jedec.org/standards-documents/docs/dg-414h  This is a free download after registration.



I don't have a copy, but somewhere in the JEDEC design standards for BGAs it should be listed, that is, if such a ratio actually exists. 

I wish I could be of more help, but that much I know.



Odin



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]

Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 11:02 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [TN] Sacrificial solder bump ratio in Nand gate BGA device



Fellow TechNetters,



   Is there an industry standard/guideline for the number of sacrificial solder bumps versus total solder bump count.   For instance, 64 sacrificial and 88 active bumps for a total of 152 bumps (42%)?

In advance I thank you for your timely response in this matter.



Victor,


ATOM RSS1 RSS2