You sure are welcome, Jeffrey. 

And never, ever, start off a posting on this forum again with an apology for asking a dumb question. There are no dumb questions, and even after 45 years in this business I (and all of us) are just as much of a "newbie" as you are! There is simply too much to learn.



Odin



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Jenkins, Jeffrey (US)

Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 3:08 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] [External] [TN] No-Clean (ROL0) question....



Doug and Richard,



Thank you both very much I do appreciate both of your assistance.  Something in the back of my mind (probably from IPC Cleanliness conferences!) said it’s not the best thing to do.  I also went and pulled the IPC-CH-65 Paul had mentioned prior and I look forward to reading it.



Best,



-Jeffrey





From: Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>

Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 12:55 PM

To: TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Jenkins, Jeffrey (US) <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: [External] [TN] No-Clean (ROL0) question....



CAUTION: Email originated from outside of Cubic.



Jeffrey,

I will send you a document that I drew up about 12 years ago, together with the late Dr. Bill Kenyon.  It talks about no-clean fluxes and why someone would choose to clean a no-clean flux.  You might find it of benefit.



There are also a number of excellent papers by Dr. Mike Bixenman of Kyzen on the nature of fluxes under QFNs that more addresses what can happen if those low solids residues do not get to the proper temperature.



Douglas Pauls | Principal Materials and Process Engr | Advanced Operations Engineering COLLINS AEROSPACE

400 Collins Road NE, MS 108-101, Cedar Rapids, IA  52498  USA

Tel: +1 319 295 2109 | Mobile: +1 319 431 3773 [log in to unmask]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/collins.com__;!!Ooxr18I!SpjguiMwPUXmAyuL-TOQ6oNFndlaWAj2leYz1JtaVdafwZmwGo_HqZ-Xr1tX1Ea26VMJ$>

[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> for all Export Compliant Items





On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:21 PM Jenkins, Jeffrey (US) <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

Fellow TechNetters,



I apologize if this may seem like a newbie question and if so I apologize.

I've used OR fluxes and RO fluxes and have always had them removed by the cleaning process as most of the products that I work on have an expected life of 10+ years.  We've typically validated the amount of WOA and Chlorides and set baselines for those.



Someone posed me a question about cleaning no-cleans. Even though in a perfect world a no-clean flux should be 100% inactive after reflow, I'm betting that's never perfectly the case.   So my view and response was that based on the life span and end use environment, my concern would be humidity/moisture mixing with the residual material and in the long term increasing the risk of dendritic growth and other things.  Am I off the mark?



Thanks,



Jeffrey A. Jenkins, CID+

Principal Engineering Designer

Cubic Mission Solutions



Note: This email and any attachments may contain confidential or proprietary information.

If you are not the intended recipient, any use or distribution is prohibited; please notify the sender and delete from your system.