Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) |
Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jan 2020 07:04:18 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
don't know - sounds like someone's PhD thesis.... Is it depend upon
mismatch stress concentration orientation? never see vertical
mismatch (pure), even with gull wing.... Is it statement backed up
with finite element modeling? If it is, the modeler usually has
their own language ;-).
IMHO.
jk
On Jan 9, 2020, at 8:50 PM, Bev Christian wrote:
> TechNetters,
>
>
>
> Can someone interpret this sentence for me?
>
> "As Sn is anisotropic, the size and orientation of the grain structure
> contributes to CTE mismatch fractures along the larger axis of a
> solder
> joint, laterally rather than vertically."
>
>
>
> I know the following:
>
> 1. Sn is anisotropic
> 2. the size and orientation of the grain structure contributes to CTE
> mismatch fractures
>
> Is the latter part (.along the larger axis of a solder joint,
> laterally
> rather than vertically.) always true and if so, why? What am I
> missing?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Bev
|
|
|