TECHNET Archives

January 2020

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Fri, 10 Jan 2020 07:04:18 -0500
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Yuan-chia Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Yuan-chia Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
don't know - sounds like someone's PhD thesis.... Is it depend upon  
mismatch stress concentration orientation?  never see vertical  
mismatch (pure), even with gull wing.... Is it statement backed up  
with finite element modeling?  If it is, the modeler usually has  
their own language ;-).
IMHO.
jk
On Jan 9, 2020, at 8:50 PM, Bev Christian wrote:

> TechNetters,
>
>
>
> Can someone interpret this sentence for me?
>
> "As Sn is anisotropic, the size and orientation of the grain structure
> contributes to CTE mismatch fractures along the larger axis of a  
> solder
> joint, laterally rather than vertically."
>
>
>
> I know the following:
>
> 1.	Sn is anisotropic
> 2.	the size and orientation of the grain structure contributes to CTE
> mismatch fractures
>
> Is the latter part (.along the larger axis of a solder joint,  
> laterally
> rather than vertically.) always true and if so, why?  What am I  
> missing?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Bev

ATOM RSS1 RSS2