TECHNET Archives

April 2019

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Yuan-chia Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Yuan-chia Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Apr 2019 09:40:44 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
does your vendor got small plating tank that not suitable for your  
large panel? (insufficient stir or agitation?)
just curious. (i know it kills the cat)
jk
On Apr 4, 2019, at 9:32 AM, Jack Olson wrote:

> I'm not used to looking at micro-sections, but I was looking at a  
> photo and
> noticed what looked like two layers of plating on top of the original
> copper layer.
> When I asked about it, I was told that the bare board supplier  
> flips the
> board 180 degrees and plates again, trying to get a more uniform  
> plating
> thickness across the panel.
> Is this a common practice?
> I haven't heard of that.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2