Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 27 Mar 2019 09:55:16 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would agree with Lloyd. I have worked with the 3M 1904 material and like
it, but like any material, it has it's drawbacks. Durability may be an
issue as Lloyd stated. It may not be suitable for higher voltage
applications. The material is thin enough to not provide any appreciable
tin whisker mitigation.
On the other hand, this stuff gets everywhere efficiently. The Novec HFE
carrier solvent takes it under parts. The relatively soft nature of the
material, which makes it a durability concern, also means you don't have to
mask connectors. Can serve as supplemental coating to coat those
components (like connectors) not normally coated.
*Douglas Pauls *| Principal Materials and Process Engr | Advanced
Operations Engineering
*COLLINS AEROSPACE*
400 Collins Road NE, MS 108-101, Cedar Rapids, IA 52498 USA
*Tel:* +1 319 295 2109 | *Mobile: *+1 319 431 3773
[log in to unmask]
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 9:15 AM lduso - Diamond-MT.com <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> I have used it before on multiple customers product. It does have its uses
> but like all materials, you need to test it to ensure it will achieve the
> desired result. It is by no means a highly durable coating like a UR or XY.
>
> Lloyd Duso
> General Manager
> Diamond-MT
> (814) 535-3505
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.Diamond-2Dmt.com&d=DwIBaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=lTRDjB8ojaf7ZaJ9DHeDAm7e-HFP9fxIkv6fRnV49HE&m=2M4OaB4ZydsNl8KqosE2Ed2Z7q_InK7_syHsUUGoWTA&s=0Ew7l-Aku_XnltftrBTCGsrBWiA-vGKAT3WORk9N5KQ&e=
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:01 AM Ed Rios <
> [log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > Good morning,
> >
> > Does anyone has experience with 3M Novec coatings? Any thoughts on pros
> > and cons vs a conformal coating?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ed
> >
>
|
|
|