TECHNET Archives

March 2019

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:57:25 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
We are having an issue with bare boards, where it seems that one or two
panels get less plating thickness than others. The fact that it seems to be
a rare occurrence makes it even harder to pin down.
The fabricator says they are shooting for 1.2 mils plating thickness, but a
few of them at seemingly random times are more like an average 0.6-0.8 mil
(we require average 1.0 with nothing less than 0.8)
We can see it by cross sectioning coupons or x-out boards of course, but
are there any other non-destructive methods of checking plating thickness
accurately? The thought of doing a micro-section on every panel is
intimidating.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2