TECHNET Archives

January 2019

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:21:14 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Thank You.
I would also be interested to know for inspection purposes - although it is
common for the whole board to be coated (except for masked areas of
course), should we only raise the red flag for exposed components and
conductive areas? I realize that the coating PROCESS may make it easier to
coat everything, but if there is a missed spot that is just bare board, is
it a FAILURE? How do other people document this?
(I'm new to this subject. Well, to be more accurate, I've been conformal
coating for decades but never had detailed discussion about it until
recently. Hoping to avoid complicated documentation)

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:36 PM Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Is it more common to conformal coat unplated mounting holes?
> or designate a clearance diameter on the assembly drawing?
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2