TECHNET Archives

December 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Decker, Scott Collins" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Decker, Scott Collins
Date:
Fri, 7 Dec 2018 17:26:57 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Here is a test message...



 What He Said... ----> Dave Hillman

Collins Aerospace

[log in to unmask]



Mic Drop...





Scott Decker | Senior Engineer, PCB Design Services CID+ | Electronic Systems Center

COLLINS AEROSPACE

3445 S. 5th Street, Suite 170, Phoenix, AZ 85040 U.S.A.

Tel: 602 308 5957  FAX: 602 243 2347

[log in to unmask]  www.collinsaerospace.com











CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING: This message may contain proprietary and/or privileged information of

Collins Aerospace Systems and its affiliated companies. If you are not the intended recipient please 1) do not disclose, copy,

distribute or use this message or its contents, 2) advise the sender by return e-mail, and 3) delete all copies (including all

attachments) from your computer. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Hillman

Sent: Friday, December 07, 2018 9:43 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] [External] Re: [TN] kicked off?



LOL - well, you just have to love the system. I am guessing that the Legacy Rockwell Collins and Legacy UTAS are recognized as valid emails but the new Collins Aerospace is not (FYI - Rockwell Collins and UTAS official merged last week now being Collins Aerospace). And why someone who was not part of either of those OEMs is getting bounced is even more a mystery. Silly electrons!



Dave Hillman

Collins Aerospace

[log in to unmask]





On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:37 AM Tom Brendlinger <[log in to unmask]>

wrote:



> The last error Gmail gave me blames Collins, and I saw the same error 

> in someone else's note.

>

> (example follows)

>

> - The last reported error was: 5.7.1 550-5.7.1 Unauthenticated email 

> from collins.com  is not  accepted  due to  domain's  550-5.7.1 DMARC  policy.

> Please contact the administrator of  collins.com domain 550-5.7.1 if 

> this was a legitimate mail. Please visit 550-5.7.1

>

> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__support.google.co

> m_mail_answer_2451690&d=DwIBaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=qMshjwqeixvQ

> js1qYTl8aRebuaqi25nLzYlpmDF6tjI&m=cj6quZN5T-GIsQ_fA2o248H_TXVhzzYWV2ee

> Rkmvcds&s=8hBQJkkh_a_SV3DMA4jZwWPzdyfbFx-BAlWCSN5jr0k&e=

> to learn about the 550 ...

> (52 bytes suppressed)

>

> Here is the short easy explanation of DMARC

>

> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dmarc.org_wiki_FA

> Q-23How-5Fdoes-5FDMARC-5Fwork.2C-5Fbriefly.2C-5Fand-5Fin-5Fnon-2Dtechn

> ical-5Fterms.3F&d=DwIBaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=qMshjwqeixvQjs1qYT

> l8aRebuaqi25nLzYlpmDF6tjI&m=cj6quZN5T-GIsQ_fA2o248H_TXVhzzYWV2eeRkmvcd

> s&s=KcRsX6mPPAut3Kz78UpR3P_GH-_jeDdPtPm7TtcjBls&e=

>

> Someone's emails are failing DMARC, which is resulting in many 

> people's email servers rejecting the message. It is possible that the 

> IPC DMARC policy is being applied to the Collins email address, but I 

> think more likely the Collins DMARC policy is either malformed for 

> mailing list type emails, or is being applied to the message after it 

> has passed through the IPC server.

>

> It's worth investigation on both the IPC and Collins end... and if 

> anyone saw different errors (or the same error referencing a different 

> domain) please post them, I'm sure it will help diagnose the issue.

>

> t

>

> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 11:20 AM David Bergman <[log in to unmask]>

> wrote:

>

> > I will ask our IT to look into this . Numbers seem too high.

> >

> > David W. Bergman

> > Vice President, Standards & Training IPC - Association Connecting 

> > Electronics Industries

> > 3000 Lakeside Drive Suite 105N

> > Bannockburn, IL 60015-1249 USA

> > +1 847-597-2840<tel:+1%20847-597-2840> tel

> > +1 847-615-5640<tel:+1%20847-615-5640> fax

> > +1 847-867-1388<tel:+1%20847-867-1388> mobile

> > [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

> > Skype: davidbergmanipc

> >

> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ipc.org&d=DwIB

> aQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=qMshjwqeixvQjs1qYTl8aRebuaqi25nLzYlpmDF6

> tjI&m=cj6quZN5T-GIsQ_fA2o248H_TXVhzzYWV2eeRkmvcds&s=NqOnOkZMAXSVx1gwxI

> mjnsbukAkdainw2iW_92d3N90&e=

> <

> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ipc.org_&d=DwI

> BaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=qMshjwqeixvQjs1qYTl8aRebuaqi25nLzYlpmDF

> 6tjI&m=cj6quZN5T-GIsQ_fA2o248H_TXVhzzYWV2eeRkmvcds&s=c88ARlxsfcM0frn00

> 4clJHMqEpv5PKBE6_Zi5yTmkXA&e=

> >

> >

> >

> > On Dec 7, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Drew A. Meyer <[log in to unmask]<mailto:

> > [log in to unmask]>> wrote:

> >

> > Guy,

> >

> > Just got booted myself!  My IT departments response was subscribe again.

> > It appears that some software guarding the email is rejecting some

> TechNet

> > emails.  After so many rejected emails TechNet un-subscribes the user.

> > Unless something changes on my end I suspect I will be un-subscribed

> again

> > shortly.  According to the note from TechNet it only took seven days 

> > for

> me

> > to accumulate enough rejected emails to be un-subscribed.

> >

> > Drew

> >

>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2