TECHNET Archives

December 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D
Date:
Fri, 7 Dec 2018 17:13:29 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Yes I already won it. I just know it.



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Hillman

Sent: Friday, December 07, 2018 11:04 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] [External] Re: [TN] kicked off?



Hi Graham - I did send out the Element Quiz today at 10:30 CST so folks

should be seeing it if the system isn't messed up.



Dave



On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 11:00 AM Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>

wrote:



> Hey, I think you have a totally cool email address, but I might be

> biased...

>

> And since the change your emails have ended up in my spam folder, which

> really hurts my already dismal odds on the element quiz!

>

> Graham Collins

> Senior Process Engineer

> Sunsel Systems

> (902) 444-7867

>

> On 12/7/2018 12:43 PM, David Hillman wrote:

>

> LOL - well, you just have to love the system. I am guessing that the Legacy

> Rockwell Collins and Legacy UTAS are recognized as valid emails but the new

> Collins Aerospace is not (FYI - Rockwell Collins and UTAS official merged

> last week now being Collins Aerospace). And why someone who was not part of

> either of those OEMs is getting bounced is even more a mystery. Silly

> electrons!

>

> Dave Hillman

> Collins [log in to unmask]

>

>

> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:37 AM Tom Brendlinger <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]>

> wrote:

>

>

> The last error Gmail gave me blames Collins, and I saw the same error in

> someone else's note.

>

> (example follows)

>

> - The last reported error was: 5.7.1 550-5.7.1 Unauthenticated email fromcollins.com  is not  accepted  due to  domain's  550-5.7.1 DMARC  policy.

> Please contact the administrator of  collins.com domain 550-5.7.1 if this

> was a legitimate mail. Please visit 550-5.7.1

> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__support.google.com_mail_answer_2451690&d=DwIBaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=qMshjwqeixvQjs1qYTl8aRebuaqi25nLzYlpmDF6tjI&m=cj6quZN5T-GIsQ_fA2o248H_TXVhzzYWV2eeRkmvcds&s=8hBQJkkh_a_SV3DMA4jZwWPzdyfbFx-BAlWCSN5jr0k&e=

> to learn about the 550 ...

> (52 bytes suppressed)

>

> Here is the short easy explanation of DMARC

> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dmarc.org_wiki_FAQ-23How-5Fdoes-5FDMARC-5Fwork.2C-5Fbriefly.2C-5Fand-5Fin-5Fnon-2Dtechnical-5Fterms.3F&d=DwIBaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=qMshjwqeixvQjs1qYTl8aRebuaqi25nLzYlpmDF6tjI&m=cj6quZN5T-GIsQ_fA2o248H_TXVhzzYWV2eeRkmvcds&s=KcRsX6mPPAut3Kz78UpR3P_GH-_jeDdPtPm7TtcjBls&e=

>

> Someone's emails are failing DMARC, which is resulting in many people's

> email servers rejecting the message. It is possible that the IPC DMARC

> policy is being applied to the Collins email address, but I think more

> likely the Collins DMARC policy is either malformed for mailing list type

> emails, or is being applied to the message after it has passed through the

> IPC server.

>

> It's worth investigation on both the IPC and Collins end... and if anyone

> saw different errors (or the same error referencing a different domain)

> please post them, I'm sure it will help diagnose the issue.

>

> t

>

> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 11:20 AM David Bergman <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]>

> wrote:

>

>

> I will ask our IT to look into this . Numbers seem too high.

>

> David W. Bergman

> Vice President, Standards & Training

> IPC - Association Connecting Electronics Industries

> 3000 Lakeside Drive Suite 105N

> Bannockburn, IL 60015-1249 USA

> +1 847-597-2840<tel:+1%20847-597-2840> tel

> +1 847-615-5640<tel:+1%20847-615-5640> fax

> +1 847-867-1388<tel:+1%20847-867-1388> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]>

> Skype: davidbergmanipc

>

>

> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ipc.org&d=DwIBaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=qMshjwqeixvQjs1qYTl8aRebuaqi25nLzYlpmDF6tjI&m=cj6quZN5T-GIsQ_fA2o248H_TXVhzzYWV2eeRkmvcds&s=NqOnOkZMAXSVx1gwxImjnsbukAkdainw2iW_92d3N90&e=

> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ipc.org_&d=DwIBaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=qMshjwqeixvQjs1qYTl8aRebuaqi25nLzYlpmDF6tjI&m=cj6quZN5T-GIsQ_fA2o248H_TXVhzzYWV2eeRkmvcds&s=c88ARlxsfcM0frn004clJHMqEpv5PKBE6_Zi5yTmkXA&e=

>

>

>

>

> On Dec 7, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Drew A. Meyer <[log in to unmask]<mailto:

> [log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

>

> Guy,

>

> Just got booted myself!  My IT departments response was subscribe again.

> It appears that some software guarding the email is rejecting some

>

> TechNet

>

> emails.  After so many rejected emails TechNet un-subscribes the user.

> Unless something changes on my end I suspect I will be un-subscribed

>

> again

>

> shortly.  According to the note from TechNet it only took seven days for

>

> me

>

> to accumulate enough rejected emails to be un-subscribed.

>

> Drew

>

>

>

>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2