TECHNET Archives

December 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Dec 2018 13:00:27 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (97 lines)
Hey, I think you have a totally cool email address, but I might be 
biased...

And since the change your emails have ended up in my spam folder, which 
really hurts my already dismal odds on the element quiz!

Graham Collins
Senior Process Engineer
Sunsel Systems
(902) 444-7867

On 12/7/2018 12:43 PM, David Hillman wrote:
> LOL - well, you just have to love the system. I am guessing that the Legacy
> Rockwell Collins and Legacy UTAS are recognized as valid emails but the new
> Collins Aerospace is not (FYI - Rockwell Collins and UTAS official merged
> last week now being Collins Aerospace). And why someone who was not part of
> either of those OEMs is getting bounced is even more a mystery. Silly
> electrons!
>
> Dave Hillman
> Collins Aerospace
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:37 AM Tom Brendlinger <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> The last error Gmail gave me blames Collins, and I saw the same error in
>> someone else's note.
>>
>> (example follows)
>>
>> - The last reported error was: 5.7.1 550-5.7.1 Unauthenticated email from
>> collins.com  is not  accepted  due to  domain's  550-5.7.1 DMARC  policy.
>> Please contact the administrator of  collins.com domain 550-5.7.1 if this
>> was a legitimate mail. Please visit 550-5.7.1
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__support.google.com_mail_answer_2451690&d=DwIBaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=qMshjwqeixvQjs1qYTl8aRebuaqi25nLzYlpmDF6tjI&m=cj6quZN5T-GIsQ_fA2o248H_TXVhzzYWV2eeRkmvcds&s=8hBQJkkh_a_SV3DMA4jZwWPzdyfbFx-BAlWCSN5jr0k&e=
>> to learn about the 550 ...
>> (52 bytes suppressed)
>>
>> Here is the short easy explanation of DMARC
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dmarc.org_wiki_FAQ-23How-5Fdoes-5FDMARC-5Fwork.2C-5Fbriefly.2C-5Fand-5Fin-5Fnon-2Dtechnical-5Fterms.3F&d=DwIBaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=qMshjwqeixvQjs1qYTl8aRebuaqi25nLzYlpmDF6tjI&m=cj6quZN5T-GIsQ_fA2o248H_TXVhzzYWV2eeRkmvcds&s=KcRsX6mPPAut3Kz78UpR3P_GH-_jeDdPtPm7TtcjBls&e=
>>
>> Someone's emails are failing DMARC, which is resulting in many people's
>> email servers rejecting the message. It is possible that the IPC DMARC
>> policy is being applied to the Collins email address, but I think more
>> likely the Collins DMARC policy is either malformed for mailing list type
>> emails, or is being applied to the message after it has passed through the
>> IPC server.
>>
>> It's worth investigation on both the IPC and Collins end... and if anyone
>> saw different errors (or the same error referencing a different domain)
>> please post them, I'm sure it will help diagnose the issue.
>>
>> t
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 11:20 AM David Bergman <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I will ask our IT to look into this . Numbers seem too high.
>>>
>>> David W. Bergman
>>> Vice President, Standards & Training
>>> IPC - Association Connecting Electronics Industries
>>> 3000 Lakeside Drive Suite 105N
>>> Bannockburn, IL 60015-1249 USA
>>> +1 847-597-2840<tel:+1%20847-597-2840> tel
>>> +1 847-615-5640<tel:+1%20847-615-5640> fax
>>> +1 847-867-1388<tel:+1%20847-867-1388> mobile
>>> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>> Skype: davidbergmanipc
>>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ipc.org&d=DwIBaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=qMshjwqeixvQjs1qYTl8aRebuaqi25nLzYlpmDF6tjI&m=cj6quZN5T-GIsQ_fA2o248H_TXVhzzYWV2eeRkmvcds&s=NqOnOkZMAXSVx1gwxImjnsbukAkdainw2iW_92d3N90&e=
>> <
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ipc.org_&d=DwIBaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=qMshjwqeixvQjs1qYTl8aRebuaqi25nLzYlpmDF6tjI&m=cj6quZN5T-GIsQ_fA2o248H_TXVhzzYWV2eeRkmvcds&s=c88ARlxsfcM0frn004clJHMqEpv5PKBE6_Zi5yTmkXA&e=
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 7, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Drew A. Meyer <[log in to unmask]<mailto:
>>> [log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Guy,
>>>
>>> Just got booted myself!  My IT departments response was subscribe again.
>>> It appears that some software guarding the email is rejecting some
>> TechNet
>>> emails.  After so many rejected emails TechNet un-subscribes the user.
>>> Unless something changes on my end I suspect I will be un-subscribed
>> again
>>> shortly.  According to the note from TechNet it only took seven days for
>> me
>>> to accumulate enough rejected emails to be un-subscribed.
>>>
>>> Drew
>>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2