TECHNET Archives

December 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Dec 2018 10:43:08 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (87 lines)
LOL - well, you just have to love the system. I am guessing that the Legacy
Rockwell Collins and Legacy UTAS are recognized as valid emails but the new
Collins Aerospace is not (FYI - Rockwell Collins and UTAS official merged
last week now being Collins Aerospace). And why someone who was not part of
either of those OEMs is getting bounced is even more a mystery. Silly
electrons!

Dave Hillman
Collins Aerospace
[log in to unmask]


On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:37 AM Tom Brendlinger <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> The last error Gmail gave me blames Collins, and I saw the same error in
> someone else's note.
>
> (example follows)
>
> - The last reported error was: 5.7.1 550-5.7.1 Unauthenticated email from
> collins.com  is not  accepted  due to  domain's  550-5.7.1 DMARC  policy.
> Please contact the administrator of  collins.com domain 550-5.7.1 if this
> was a legitimate mail. Please visit 550-5.7.1
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__support.google.com_mail_answer_2451690&d=DwIBaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=qMshjwqeixvQjs1qYTl8aRebuaqi25nLzYlpmDF6tjI&m=cj6quZN5T-GIsQ_fA2o248H_TXVhzzYWV2eeRkmvcds&s=8hBQJkkh_a_SV3DMA4jZwWPzdyfbFx-BAlWCSN5jr0k&e=
> to learn about the 550 ...
> (52 bytes suppressed)
>
> Here is the short easy explanation of DMARC
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dmarc.org_wiki_FAQ-23How-5Fdoes-5FDMARC-5Fwork.2C-5Fbriefly.2C-5Fand-5Fin-5Fnon-2Dtechnical-5Fterms.3F&d=DwIBaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=qMshjwqeixvQjs1qYTl8aRebuaqi25nLzYlpmDF6tjI&m=cj6quZN5T-GIsQ_fA2o248H_TXVhzzYWV2eeRkmvcds&s=KcRsX6mPPAut3Kz78UpR3P_GH-_jeDdPtPm7TtcjBls&e=
>
> Someone's emails are failing DMARC, which is resulting in many people's
> email servers rejecting the message. It is possible that the IPC DMARC
> policy is being applied to the Collins email address, but I think more
> likely the Collins DMARC policy is either malformed for mailing list type
> emails, or is being applied to the message after it has passed through the
> IPC server.
>
> It's worth investigation on both the IPC and Collins end... and if anyone
> saw different errors (or the same error referencing a different domain)
> please post them, I'm sure it will help diagnose the issue.
>
> t
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 11:20 AM David Bergman <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > I will ask our IT to look into this . Numbers seem too high.
> >
> > David W. Bergman
> > Vice President, Standards & Training
> > IPC - Association Connecting Electronics Industries
> > 3000 Lakeside Drive Suite 105N
> > Bannockburn, IL 60015-1249 USA
> > +1 847-597-2840<tel:+1%20847-597-2840> tel
> > +1 847-615-5640<tel:+1%20847-615-5640> fax
> > +1 847-867-1388<tel:+1%20847-867-1388> mobile
> > [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> > Skype: davidbergmanipc
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ipc.org&d=DwIBaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=qMshjwqeixvQjs1qYTl8aRebuaqi25nLzYlpmDF6tjI&m=cj6quZN5T-GIsQ_fA2o248H_TXVhzzYWV2eeRkmvcds&s=NqOnOkZMAXSVx1gwxImjnsbukAkdainw2iW_92d3N90&e=
> <
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ipc.org_&d=DwIBaQ&c=ilBQI1lupc9Y65XwNblLtw&r=qMshjwqeixvQjs1qYTl8aRebuaqi25nLzYlpmDF6tjI&m=cj6quZN5T-GIsQ_fA2o248H_TXVhzzYWV2eeRkmvcds&s=c88ARlxsfcM0frn004clJHMqEpv5PKBE6_Zi5yTmkXA&e=
> >
> >
> >
> > On Dec 7, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Drew A. Meyer <[log in to unmask]<mailto:
> > [log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> >
> > Guy,
> >
> > Just got booted myself!  My IT departments response was subscribe again.
> > It appears that some software guarding the email is rejecting some
> TechNet
> > emails.  After so many rejected emails TechNet un-subscribes the user.
> > Unless something changes on my end I suspect I will be un-subscribed
> again
> > shortly.  According to the note from TechNet it only took seven days for
> me
> > to accumulate enough rejected emails to be un-subscribed.
> >
> > Drew
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2