TECHNET Archives

December 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Wire wrapped terminations
From:
"Vargas, Stephen M" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Vargas, Stephen M
Date:
Mon, 3 Dec 2018 22:08:20 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines) 
Ben:



     We treat it as a round lead and use criteria described in IPC-A-610, section 8.3.6. 



Regards,

Steve Vargas

 

Lockheed Martin RMS-Rotary and Mission Systems

Polaris Contract Mfg.

15 Barnabas Rd

Marion, MA 02738

774-553-6192

[log in to unmask]

 

 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Gumpert, Ben (US)

Sent: Monday, December 3, 2018 4:44 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: EXTERNAL: [TN] Wire wrapped terminations



TechNetters,



Is anyone familiar with what I'll call 'wire wrapped terminations'?



Such as:

https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Coiltronics-Eaton/CTX300-4-R?qs=yzwxPInThYQ4vFyw6jLRIQ%3D%3D

http://www.vishay.com/docs/34069/lpt4545.pdf

https://products.pulseelex.com/product-details/p0926nl/163/



A request came up at the last J-STD-001 committee meeting for solder joint criteria on these types of terminations, but without any suggestions.

I can't find anything from the vendors for a recommendation. Does anyone know of any testing done with these parts, or know of some recommended solder joint criteria?



Ben

ATOM RSS1 RSS2