TECHNET Archives

September 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D
Date:
Thu, 6 Sep 2018 17:42:49 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Well, that's close enough for govmint werk, LOL!





-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wayne Showers

Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2018 11:34 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] PTH Fine-Pitch Definition



Richard, I am somewhat in your boat, but the definition I was always presented with is .65mm (25.6mil) and smaller is classified as fine pitch.  This is the definition used by Topline for their dummy parts.  I have also seen this number floated about in several papers and equipment manuals.



For lack of clarity, I would propose this as a good guideline based on IPC inspection criteria.

That is, once we are at 0.65mm (and lower), the lead width itself, by necessity, reduces to 10 mils (0.25mm) give or take.

At 10 mil (0.25mm) lead width, Table 1-2 of IPC-A-610 jumps the required inspection magnification from (7.5X to 10X) up to 20X for inspection.

  


ATOM RSS1 RSS2