TECHNET Archives

September 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 12 Sep 2018 10:52:50 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential  





Thanks for sharing,



Doc is withdrawn.........



Victor,



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D

Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 2:45 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] Vendor Reel Parts Marking



You should look in EIA-583, as that has more MSD information.



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wayne Showers

Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 2:41 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] Vendor Reel Parts Marking



EIA-481 series is minimal in regards to standardized reel and part number markings.  It is an ongoing issue as if they were consistent and with a barcode, incoming inspection would be much easier.



As for the sideline on PCBs in dry chambers:

When stacking in a dry chamber, if the PCBs are already dried, then having a bag keeps the product together without needing seal and dry-pack.

It is nearly impossible to dry PCBs in a dry chamber (hedging my bets, but chambers are designed to, will keep stuff dry, not dry it.)  The PCBs would need to be stickered (air gaps between layers) to even think about drying (as you presumed).

IPC-STD-1601 is the preferred standard for PCB handling, drying, et cetera.  


ATOM RSS1 RSS2