TECHNET Archives

September 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:35:11 -0400
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: PTH Fine-Pitch Definition
From:
Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
I would agree with 1.27mm for THT.
0.5mm for SMT

On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:30 AM Ron Feyereisen <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Is there an established definition for what would be considered a PTH
> fine-pitch component?
>
> Is any pitch of 1.27mm or less considered to be the definition?
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Ron
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2