Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 6 Sep 2018 08:37:49 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Message-ID: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="utf-8" |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
IMC has been the bane of my existence more than once. So here is my take from experience backed up with some lab evidence.
I have had failures attributable to insufficient IMC. Almost all of these were corrected by either ramp-to-peak or increased time above liquidus / intimate contact time / temperature.
For SAC, the intimate contact temperature I have been able to dial in on is time above 208C after liquidus is achieved.
For SnPb, the intimate contact temperature I have been able to dial in on is time above 177C after liquidus is achieved.
I have found that if I can back end a little more time above these temperatures on the profile, I have more consistent joints. I have not devoted a whole lot of 'science' on these numbers just 20+ years of trial and error coupled with white papers, IPC BOK, and other research.
I have yet to have a problem or a return tied to excessive IMC. I am sure that at some point excessive IMC may cause or have caused a failure mode, I just have not seen it. The few times where it may have been a contributing cause, I also cooked the parts making cross-sectioning of the IMC moot.
|
|
|