TECHNET Archives

August 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Wayne Showers <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Aug 2018 14:13:51 +0000
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, "Stadem, Richard D" <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D" <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
base64
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Good information, thanks for posting it.

I had heard that dealing with the dust was a major OSHA issue as FR-4 dust is a carcinogen and must be handled accordingly.

Thanks for clearing that up.



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wayne Showers

Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 9:01 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [TN] Depaneling Router Machines - recommendation



Richard, there is a limited cost and I included that in the baseline.  Most use an integrated vacuum filter system which collects the dust.  This is pretty much standard on all new equipment.  I used a heavy duty, high capacity Shop Vac at my last job to collect the dust from Cencorp 1000 series routers.  It helped that Shop Vac was close by.  If I were needing to jury rig a system again, I would use a Stanley as they are much quieter and are easier to fit the hepa filters.



As far as the contacts that I give, they are persons who have done well by me and that is saying something as I am known to be both intense and demanding.  


ATOM RSS1 RSS2