Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 2 Aug 2018 14:27:19 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp=yes; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
with that size, the molding compound possibly below minimum thickness
(2.3 mm square)... most likely, wlp kind of stuff - under molding to
save diamond saw for cutting... just a guess.
jk
On Aug 2, 2018, at 1:48 PM, David Hillman wrote:
> Hi Graham - other than the bad sunburn jokes you will get on this,
> why is
> there a concern for UV exposure?
>
> Dave Hillman
> Rockwell Collins
> [log in to unmask]
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Graham Collins
> <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello TechNet!
>>
>> I've got a customer who is looking to protect an IC from exposure
>> to UV.
>> It is a tiny 24 ball BGA (2.3 mm square). They are suggesting a
>> dam and
>> glob-top solution, but I'm concerned that there isn't enough room
>> around it
>> (very, very small board). I've suggested a dab of black conformal
>> coating
>> material on a brush. Any other great solutions?
>>
>> --
>> Graham Collins
>> Senior Process Engineer
>> Sunsel Systems
>> (902) 444-7867
>>
|
|
|