Hi Joyce - no, not a counterfeit component issue and not an issue of an
significant concern. Just not an purpose I am at liberty to discuss.

Dave

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 3:42 PM, Yuan-chia Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> such as some counterfeit part got into the system?  you don't have to
> answer...;-)
> jk
> On Jun 11, 2018, at 3:56 PM, David Hillman wrote:
>
> Hi Reuven - the purpose for the destructive test is not a short cut around
>> a full monitoring/reporting system, I have a different purpose for needing
>> the assessment.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi David,
>>> Shortcut is not the right way to monitor the REACH-SVHC 181 substances.
>>> You should data collect from each parts / Mfrs the SVHC details and FMD
>>> data.
>>>
>>> נשלח מה-iPhone של ראובן רוקח
>>>
>>> ב-11 ביוני 2018, בשעה 17:00, ‏‏Bev Christian ‏<
>>> [log in to unmask]>
>>> כתב/ה:‬
>>>
>>> Dave,
>>>> I would start with
>>>> www.claigan.com/contact/
>>>> Claigan Environmental Inc. 4043 Carling Avenue, Suite 120. Kanata, ON
>>>>
>>> K2K 2A4 Canada. Phone: +1 (613) 599-4444. Sales: +1 (613) 853-5271
>>>
>>>>
>>>> However, REACH testing can be VERY expensive.  You need to focus on the
>>>>
>>> chemicals that are the most likely to be present.  The most likely
>>> culprits
>>> are phthalates.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Bev
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of David Hillman
>>>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 9:48 AM
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: [TN] REACH Compliance
>>>>
>>>> Hi team! Hey, I am looking for laboratories who can take a printed
>>>>
>>> circuit assembly and conduct a destructive REACH compliance assessment.
>>> Please shoot me an off line email with any suggested resources you would
>>> recommend.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> TIA
>>>>
>>>> Dave Hillman
>>>> Rockwell Collins
>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>