TECHNET Archives

May 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wayne Showers <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Wayne Showers <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 May 2018 16:45:24 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (3 lines)
The Aven lights have the same longer wavelength (400nm) that Doug is debating.  I have had some escapes using these UV-ring lamps.   The inspection was of Parylene which is known to be spotty at best for fluorescing, but checking under a UV-A lamp showed clearly the coating on the pins which was the defect.  The defect did not show up nearly was well under the ring light.  NADCAP AC7114 has not been cross applied to AC7120 as of yet, but should it be, then these lamps will not meet standard.
Unfortunately, if there is any call-out for NADCAP, ASTM or other industry standard requirement, unless a UV pass filter is used, then both Doug's UV lights and the AVEN combo Halo's do not meet specification.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2