TECHNET Archives

May 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 May 2018 13:34:37 +0000
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Jose A Rios <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Bow and Twist measurements per IPC 650 TM 2.4.22, IPC 600-2.11 Flatness
From:
Jose A Rios <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
base64
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines) 
2.4.22 is only for bare (unpopulated) PWB’s, and the rigid portion of rigid-flex PWB's. Section 1 (Scope) explicitly excludes PCBA’s from being evaluated using this method.





José (Joey) Ríos, Sr QA Engineer

Mission Assurance Manager

Kavli Institute for Astrophysics & Space Research

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

(617)324-6272









On May 16, 2018, at 7:17 AM, [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> wrote:



Fellow TechNetters:



  Is there a separate Bow & Twist Test/documentation for Printed Wire Boards, PWB, and Printed Wire Board Assemblies, PWBAs?   Are they interchangeable......



Victor,

ATOM RSS1 RSS2