TECHNET Archives

April 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Flux question
From:
John Burke <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:28:07 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines) 
	
		
		
	
		I doubt that ROLO will work you need to run solderability testing using your flux and a wetting balance tester.
		
		

		Sent from my iPad Pro
	





On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:07 AM -0700, "Jose A Rios" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:










Is ROL0 flux an adequate one when faced with having to solder marginally oxidized components. Or should a different flux type be selected. Application is ground based/hi-rel (non flight). Flowdown is J-001 (not space addendum). Thanks….


José (Joey) Ríos, Sr QA Engineer
Mission Assurance Manager
Kavli Institute for Astrophysics & Space Research
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
[log in to unmask]
(617)324-6272

ATOM RSS1 RSS2