 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Mar 2018 13:22:47 -0400 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Guy,
Foil over the emitter. The difference in the image resolution is minimal. I don’t understand the bit about the system compensating.
Bev
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Guy Ramsey
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 12:47 PM
To: TechNet E-Mail Forum; BEV CHRISTIAN
Subject: Re: [TN] X-ray damage to components
Wouldn't the system simply increase the power to compensate? Foil over the part? or the emitter?
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:37 PM, BEV CHRISTIAN <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Guy,
We put ordinary aluminum foil over our x-ray source.
Regards,
Bev
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: John Burke
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 12:01 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] X-ray damage to components
You will get a downshift on the flash in the embedded SSD with too much exposure 5 dx typically no problem but extended 3D will cause the issue.
Sent from my iPad Pro
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:50 AM -0700, "Guy Ramsey" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Anyone have experience with AXI damaging devices like embedded SSD,
mosfets, or programmed memory devices?
We are seeing lower than normal yields at test. Our assembly processes seem
well controlled. So, we were brainstorming for places that might deserve
closer evaluation.
|
|
|
