TECHNET Archives

March 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Mar 2018 12:47:14 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (54 lines)
Wouldn't the system simply increase the power to compensate?  Foil over the
part? or the emitter?

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:37 PM, BEV CHRISTIAN <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Guy,
> We put ordinary aluminum foil over our x-ray source.
> Regards,
> Bev
>
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>
> From: John Burke
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 12:01 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] X-ray damage to components
>
>
>
>
>
>
>                 You will get a downshift on the flash in the embedded SSD
> with too much exposure 5 dx typically no problem but extended 3D will cause
> the issue.
>
>
>                 Sent from my iPad Pro
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:50 AM -0700, "Guy Ramsey" <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Anyone have experience with AXI damaging devices like embedded SSD,
> mosfets, or programmed memory devices?
> We are seeing lower than normal yields at test. Our assembly processes seem
> well controlled. So, we were brainstorming for places that might deserve
> closer evaluation.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2