Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 20 Mar 2018 12:47:14 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<20180320163706.HBSK31064.torspm02.bell.net@IPv6:::ffff:192.168.2.15> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Wouldn't the system simply increase the power to compensate? Foil over the
part? or the emitter?
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:37 PM, BEV CHRISTIAN <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Guy,
> We put ordinary aluminum foil over our x-ray source.
> Regards,
> Bev
>
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>
> From: John Burke
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 12:01 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] X-ray damage to components
>
>
>
>
>
>
> You will get a downshift on the flash in the embedded SSD
> with too much exposure 5 dx typically no problem but extended 3D will cause
> the issue.
>
>
> Sent from my iPad Pro
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:50 AM -0700, "Guy Ramsey" <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Anyone have experience with AXI damaging devices like embedded SSD,
> mosfets, or programmed memory devices?
> We are seeing lower than normal yields at test. Our assembly processes seem
> well controlled. So, we were brainstorming for places that might deserve
> closer evaluation.
>
|
|
|