TECHNET Archives

February 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Decker, Scott UTAS" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Decker, Scott UTAS
Date:
Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:36:43 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
I agree with Richard. I was a firm believer in keeping them to protect the via barrels from cracking, so no  way was I going to do it. Then there was a study done many years ago, (I don't remember who did it) that showed that only for very thick boards, like .120" or more, was there any benefit to leaving them in. That benefit was very small and it was not as much as you get from the Fabricator and such, for the extra space you got... That said, we pull them on all of our boards and we do class 3's all the time. One additional thing I just thought of. In the past I used a lot, (ok almost exclusively polyimide boards) and I believe that was where the benefit was a good one, but I don't remember now for sure since we don't use Polyimide here. :-]





Scott Decker – Staff Engineer, PCB Design Services CID+ – Electronic Systems Center

UTC AEROSPACE SYSTEMS

3445 S. 5th Street, Suite 170, Phoenix, AZ 85040 U.S.A.

Tel: 602 308 5957  FAX: 602 243 2347

KE7MWT  AKA:PadMasterson

[log in to unmask]   www.utcaerospacesystems.com



CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING: This message may contain proprietary and/or privileged information of

UTC Aerospace Systems and its affiliated companies. If you are not the intended recipient please 1) do not disclose, copy,

distribute or use this message or its contents, 2) advise the sender by return e-mail, and 3) delete all copies (including all

attachments) from your computer. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.

This Document Does Not Contain Export Controlled Technology Or Technical Data.



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D

Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 10:19 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [External] Re: [TN] Non Functioning pads



I don't see why not, unless they are used for capacitance or antennae.

If they are NOT used for those purposes, then they should be removed for the same reason.



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Larry

Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 11:12 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [TN] Non Functioning pads



Is there any reason I cannot remove non functioning pads on the inner layers for an Class 3 PCB?



Many thanks,



Larry


ATOM RSS1 RSS2