TECHNET Archives

February 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jose A Rios <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Jose A Rios <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Feb 2018 15:50:22 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (93 lines)
IPC 6012D has 1x solder float (method 2.6.8) as the default method; the above (2.6.27) is also supported by 6012, but it has to be specified by the user in procurement documentation (whether its the drawing or a PO clause elsewhere). If its not specifically called out, 2.6.8 prevails as the thermal stress method used during acceptance. Fabs may have a mix of product requirements in builds at the same time that would result in some testing to 2.6.27 for specific builds but no fab would do a 2.6.27 without it being imposed specifically.


José (Joey) Ríos, Sr QA Engineer
Mission Assurance Manager
Kavli Institute for Astrophysics & Space Research
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
(617)324-6272




On Feb 2, 2018, at 7:28 AM, Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

Fwiw, we put our thermal stress/lot acceptance stuff like this in a PWB supplier Quality Rqmts Document (minimize clutter on fab drawings).    PO, drawing or stand alone document -- all work. Just a matter of style preferred.

We also have a section in that document outlining our basic qualification/reliability demonstration requirements (with some weasel words/disclaimers about it being a TBD on a case by case basis. Depends on specific end use case & class of product a qual effort is being used for).

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Craig Sullivan
Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 5:50 AM
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [TN] Thermal Stressing PCB per TM-650 2.6.27

Hi All,



I am wondering about thermal stress testing per IPC-TM-650 2.6.27 (260° reflow profile 6x) as one of the requirements in IPC-6012



For Assemblers:

Do you require this of all fab houses you buy from?

Do you request your customer add it to the FAB drawing?



For Fab Houses:

Do you automatically do this as part of your QC plan ?

How often? Per lot? Per Date Code? Etc.

Do you only do it when requested?

Do you require it to be on the fab drawing or could a CM flow it down through the PO even though the fab drawing is from the end customer?

Material depending, would you run 260° even if it was not a lead-free PCB?



Any other comments welcomed.



Craig Sullivan

Manufacturing Engineer

IT Administrator

Phone:  (607) 266-0480 x115

Fax:  (607) 266-0482

Email:  <mailto:[log in to unmask]> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

Web:   <http://www.mplinc.com/> www.mplinc.com<http://www.mplinc.com>



MPL, Inc.

41 Dutch Mill Road  |  Ithaca  |  NY  |  14850

An ISO 9001:2008 Certified and ITAR Registered Company

IPC member since 2004



 _____

Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail contains privileged and confidential information which is the property of MPL Incorporated, intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized use or disclosure of this information is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please immediately notify MPL Incorporated and destroy any copies of this email. Receipt of this e-mail shall not be deemed a waiver by MPL Incorporated of any privilege or the confidential nature of the information.

Export Control:
This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain information that is company confidential or privileged. Any technical data in this message may be exported only in accordance with the U.S. International Traffic in Arms Regulations (22 CFR Parts 120-130) or the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730-774). Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, you should not read, copy, disclose or otherwise use this message. If you have received this email in error, please delete it, and advise the sender immediately.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2