TECHNET Archives

January 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: IPC-TM-2.1.1 Microscetioning, Manual Method Rev E
From:
Jose A Rios <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Jose A Rios <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Jan 2018 17:07:00 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines) 
That was on purpose, to strip any kind of stated, inferred or implied performance or workmanship acceptance criteria appearing in test methods, and defer to acceptance criteria stated in performance specs only.

> On Jan 3, 2018, at 9:06 AM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> 
> Fellow TechNetters:
> 
>   I am reviewing the above stated IPC-Test Method.   In sections 5.3.7 and 5.4, I DO NOT see reference to IPC-A-600, Acceptability of Printed Wire Boards.   It has more QUALITY photos there than the reference IPC-MS-810.   The same hold true for TM 2.6.8,   2.6.27
> 
> Victor,

ATOM RSS1 RSS2